The Green Plant Kingdom definitely verifies one of my many
Proven Scientific Facts which destroys Darwin’s Theory of Evolution

HOW DO I PROVE CREATION WEEK?

HOW CAN I PROVE THAT EACH OF THE DAYS IN GENESIS ONE ARE 24 HOUR DAYS ONLY?

HOW CAN I PROVE THAT EVOLUTION NEVER HAPPENED?

Answers:

The natural unchangeable established laws of green plants totally and clearly deny mutational evolution. You will enjoy studying the natural laws of green plants. The Green Kingdom of Plants interacts with the Animal Kingdom for pollination and fertilization; without both Kingdoms simultaneously symbiotically interacting daily we would have had no life forms whatsoever. Billions of years between plants, animals, birds, and bees would destroy all life forms; as Flora requires Fauna daily to produce food and to replicate the plants. Billions of years between the existence of Flora and Fauna on Earth would have destroyed life. Evolution can not account for simultaneous mandatory 24 hour symbiotic interaction for plant replication and food.

Plants only operate daily on the 24 hour circadian rhythm for growth. Plants have a different agenda for days then they do for nights. The daylight operation produces the all important action of photosynthesis, giving plants light energy to be converted daily into oxygen, plus chemical energy (ATP). The plants then at night produce the specific food provided by the ATP with mineralized water for each separate plant. If we had time periods for thousands of years for each of the seven days of Creation Week plant metabolism would be in chaos; as plants carefully monitor night time metabolism. What could a plant do if it had a thousand years of sunshine as evolutionists espouse? It would dry up and destroy the plant. Conversely, what could a plant do if it had a thousand years of night? How would it produce ATP without sunshine and photosynthesis? How would oxygen be produced without daily photosynthesis? Photosynthesis which is based on the 24 hour biological time frame is the most important scientific fact known to mankind. Without it we could not have oxygen for all life forms, or adenosine triphosphate (ATP) for metabolism and food.

Question for you. How could you get life on Earth with the evolutionary supposition time frame? The 24 hour day for all metabolism is biblical true science. Anything other than this is not scientific; but is only unsupported supposition and amounts to science fiction. Conclusion Moses was right; Darwin was wrong!

Darwin’s final summary of his Evolutionary Hypothesis

When Charles Darwin was about to finish his life in England as a self-proclaimed scientist, after evaluating his own studies and writings on his hypothesis of evolution, he made some extremely strong and enlightening statements. They are placed here for your personal perusal. Notably, Mr. Darwin had no formal scientific education.

Renowned scientists are declaring evolution wrong. Most scientists and academics do not know the following facts about Charles Darwin and his scientific assumptions. Here is what Charles Darwin said about his own work:
"I HAVE ASKED MYSELF WHETHER I MAY NOT HAVE DEVOTED MY LIFE TO A FANTASY. I AM READY TO CRY WITH VEXATION AT MY BLINDNESS AND PRESUMPTION."  .....* Herbert Wendt: “From Ape to Man” - N.Y. The Bubbs Merril Co. 1972
 

Charles Darwin wrote, in Origin of the Species by Natural Selection, page 206:

"BUT, AS BY THIS THEORY INNUMERABLE TRANSITIONAL FORMS MUST HAVE EXISTED, WHY DO WE NOT FIND THEM EMBEDDED IN COUNTLESS NUMBERS IN THE CRUST OF THE EARTH?"

Further on in page 292, he said:

"BUT JUST IN PROPORTION AS THIS PROCESS OF EXTERMINATION HAS ACTED ON AN ENORMOUS SCALE, SO MUST THE NUMBERS OF INTERMEDIATE VARIETIES, WHICH HAVE FORMERLY EXISTED ON THE EARTH BE TRULY ENORMOUS. WHY IS NOT EVERY GEOLOGICAL FORMATION AND EVERY STRATUM FULL OF SUCH INTERMEDIATE LINKS? GEOLOGY ASSUREDLY DOES NOT REVEAL SUCH FINELY GRADUATED ORGANIC CHAIN; AND THIS, PERHAPS, IS THE MOST OBVIOUS AND GRAVEST OBJECTION WHICH CAN BE URGED AGAINST MY THEORY OF EVOLUTION."

Darwin, by the end of his life said:

"I WAS A YOUNG MAN WITH UNFORMED IDEAS. I THREW OUT QUERIES, SUGGESTIONS, WONDERING ALL THE TIME OVER EVERYTHING; TO MY ASTONISHMENT THE IDEAS TOOK LIKE WILDFIRE. PEOPLE MADE A RELIGION OUT OF THEM."
 

Nevertheless, the damage was done. In a letter to Asa Gray, a Harvard professor of biology, Darwin wrote:

"I AM QUITE CONSCIOUS THAT MY SPECULATIONS RUN QUITE BEYOND THE BOUNDS OF TRUE SCIENCE." *Charles Darwin quoted in N.C. Gillespie, University of Chicago book – “Charles Darwin & The Problem of Creation” (1979 p.2)
 

AND MOSES SAID:

“IN THE BEGINNING GOD CREATED THE HEAVENS AND THE EARTH.”

 

SCIENTISTS MAKE DECLARATIONS:

“DNA is an immensely complicated, complex organic molecule composed of many individual atoms. Each turn of the double helix contains over 700 atoms of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen or phosphorus, with absolutely precise arrangements of the same, which differ in each type of organism being constructed.” Bio-Technology - The World of Science (Andromeda Oxford Ltd. Oxfordshire, England 1991)

“Segments of the double helix structure may not vary much; but the genetic code combinations are infinite, thereby defining that DNA molecules are immensely complicated.” * Roland George Prodaniuk - Advanced Problematist, Theorist, and Universarian (Pro Consulting Scientific Research Institute, Advanced Problemistry Dept. Edmonton, Canada 2007)

“The creation account in Genesis and the theory of evolution could not be reconciled. One must be right and the other wrong. The story of fossils agreed with the account of Genesis. In the oldest rocks we did not find a series of fossils covering the gradual changes from the most primitive creatures to developed forms; but rather in the oldest rocks, developed species suddenly appeared. Between every species there was a complete absence of intermediate fossils.” D. B. Gower - Biochemist, “Scientists Rejects Evolution” (Kentish Times, England, December 11, 1975, p.4)

“From the almost total absence of fossil evidence relative to the origin of the phyla, it follows that any explanation of the mechanisms in the creative evolution of the fundamental structural plans is heavily burdened with hypothesis. This should appear as an epigraph to every book on evolution. The lack of direct evidence leads to the formulation of pure conjecture as to the genesis of the phyla; we do not even have a basis to determine the extent to which these opinions are correct.” Pierre-Paul De Grasse, “Evolution of Living Organisms”(1977 - p. 31)

"It is not even possible to make a caricature (hazy sketch) of an evolution out of palaeobiological facts. The fossil material is now so complete...the lack of transition series cannot be explained as due to the scarcity of the materials. The deficiencies are real; they will never be filled." N. Heribert Nilsson: “The Synthetic Origin of Species” (1953) p.1212 Synthethetische Artbildung

"If this view of evolution is true, the fossil record should produce an enormous number of transitional forms. Natural history museums should be overflowing with undoubted intermediate forms. About 250,000 fossil species have been collected and classified. These fossil species have been collected at random from rocks that are supposed to represent all of the geological periods of Earth's history. Applying evolution theory and the laws of probability, most of these 250,000 species should represent transition forms. Thus, if evolution is true, there should be no doubt, question, or debate as to the fact of evolution. Duane T. Gish – “The Origin of Mammals in Creation: The Cutting Edge” (1982 - p. 76)

"Now, after about 120 years of the most extensive and painstaking geological exploration of every continent and ocean bottom, the picture is infinitely more vivid and complete than it was in 1859. Formations have been discovered containing hundreds of billions of fossils and our museums are now fill with over 100 million fossils of 250,000 species. The availability of this profusion of hard scientific data should permit objective investigators to determine if Darwin was on the right track." Luther D. Sunderland, Darwin's Enigma (1988) - p. 9.

“Contrary to what most scientists write, the fossil record does not support the Darwinian theory of evolution; because it is this theory (there are several) which we use to interpret the fossil record. By doing so, we are guilty of circular reasoning if we then say the fossil record supports this theory.” Ronald R. West: “Palaeontology & Uniformitarianism” - In Compass, (May 1968, p. 216)
 

THE EVOLUTIONIST’S IMAGINARY TIME LINE

This misleading time scale presented above is the evolutionist’s best guess at when certain components of life took place in the history of geology and biology.

Evolutionists surmise that geology began with the presumed Big Bang almost five billion years go. Biological life slowly began to evolve from that point onward.

The hypothetical time line shows us what the estimated preferred time is, for each stage of evolution by leading evolutionists. You will readily notice that from the time of the Big Bang, the evolution of blue-green algae took a billion years for development. After another billion years, the first primitive miniscule fish evolved from algae. At the same time particles of algae washed up on the shore eventually evolving into green grass.

During the next billion years green land plants with vegetables and fruit bearing trees slowly develop while evolving from one simple stage to another more complex phase.

During the next billion years, bacteria and nitrogen evolved, followed by all winged and creeping creatures. The next evolutionary stage produced larger fish and birds. Tiny animals appeared during the fourth billion years and slowly evolved into larger animals both carnivorous and herbivorous. These animals produced apes and chimpanzees, which in time evolved into exceedingly complex man and woman. However, how could this be?

How could any green plant life have existed and evolved in the evolutionary past without the insect, bird and animal kingdoms being present simultaneously for pollination-fertilization, for plant reproduction?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

These e-books are a complementary gift that I am giving to you for every donation of $10 or more per book to help maintain our science research and teaching.
Please order via e-mail request at genesisscience@yahoo.ca and I would be happy to e-mail any one or more of my books to you immediately for you to enjoy studying.

Donations are accepted via PayPal.  
A BIG THANK YOU TO EVERYONE FOR YOUR SUPPORT!

EURO

USD

CANADIAN